The Push for Expanding College Football Playoff Automatic Qualifiers: Ryan Day and the Big Ten’s Case
The landscape of college football is currently buzzing with discussions around the expansion of the College Football Playoff (CFP). A key figure driving this dialogue is Ohio State’s head coach, Ryan Day, who has become a prominent advocate for expanding the number of automatic qualifiers (AQs) granted to conferences—particularly the Big Ten—as college football approaches a new chapter in postseason competition.
—
Ryan Day’s CFP Success and Perspective
Since the four-team College Football Playoff system’s inception in 2014, Ohio State has been a consistent competitor, securing six CFP appearances, including four under Ryan Day’s leadership (2019, 2020, 2022, 2024). Notably, in the inaugural 12-team playoff format implemented in 2024, Day led Ohio State to a national championship—a win that has positioned him as both a validated and influential voice in playoff reform.
Following his team’s success in this expanded format, Day has openly argued that the Big Ten should be allocated at least four automatic bids to the CFP. His rationale centers on the sheer strength and size of the Big Ten, which now houses nearly 20 programs following recent expansions, including high-caliber additions like Oregon. With this concentration of talent and competitiveness, Day contends that limiting the conference to one or two locked playoff spots fails to reflect its quality and depth.
—
The Big Ten’s Argument for Four Automatic Qualifiers
The Big Ten’s current structure and performance powerfully support Day’s claim. The conference’s expansion to 18 teams creates a vast, competitive pool that regularly fields multiple top-ranked programs. Last season alone, four Big Ten teams earned playoff berths, underscoring the league’s dominance and the potential drawbacks of constraining AQs under the current or even a modestly expanded CFP model.
Day’s point is also a rebuke of perceived underseeding issues. For example, some analysts argue Ohio State was “under seeded” despite its national champion status, suggesting playoff access and seeding can at times be imperfect or politically influenced. Expanding automatic bids to four would ensure that multiple elite programs from the Big Ten receive rightful playoff entry, minimizing the risk of worthy teams being excluded or undervalued.
—
Broader Implications: Conference Strength and Equity
Day’s push dovetails with a wider debate over the balance of power among conferences. Traditionally, the CFP committee has favored the Big Ten and the Southeastern Conference (SEC), given their historic dominance and television appeal. Together, these two conferences garnered nearly 60% of playoff spots in the early CFP years. Advocates like Day argue that more automatic berths for these conferences would both reward consistent excellence and reflect market realities, including fan interest and TV ratings.
However, critics warn that allotting multiple AQs to certain conferences could deepen disparities, marginalizing smaller conferences and potentially hollowing out competitive diversity. As the playoff expands—rumored to possibly include 14 or 16 teams by 2026—the structure of automatic qualifiers versus at-large selections remains key to preserving fair competition while rewarding performance.
—
The Role of Other Coaches and Observers
Several prominent figures echo and complicate Day’s comments. Former coaches like Urban Meyer and Matt Rhule have highlighted the necessity of coaches “making the playoff” to justify their tenure, pointing to performance pressures at programs like Ohio State. Meanwhile, commentators note that Day’s vocal stance, following a championship run, carries more weight in lobbying efforts for structural change.
This movement aligns with broader trends in college football scheduling and postseason access. Calls for automatic qualifiers aren’t merely about numbers; they reflect evolving views on conference prestige, scheduling challenges, and how best to capture the sport’s competitive spirit.
—
Toward a New Playoff Era
With the CFP on the verge of expansion, Ryan Day’s advocacy for multiple automatic bids from the Big Ten represents a critical perspective shaping the sport’s postseason future. It is a call grounded in recent championship success, conference growth, and a desire for the playoff system to more accurately represent the strength and depth of major conferences.
Whether the CFP committee adopts this model remains to be seen, but Day’s argument challenges stakeholders to rethink competitive equity, conference representation, and playoff inclusivity as college football enters a new era.
—
Conclusion: A Playoff Future Worth Watching
Ryan Day’s call for the Big Ten to have “at least four” automatic College Football Playoff bids crystallizes the tension between tradition and expansion, prestige and fairness. As the sport contemplates larger playoff formats, these discussions will shape how champions are crowned and which teams gain opportunities on college football’s biggest stage. Big Ten fans, committees, and rivals alike will be watching closely as this debate unfolds, marking possibly one of the most transformative moments in the CFP’s short history.
