Cardi B and the Troubled Launch of the WAP Memecoin: A Deep Dive into Controversy and Crypto Culture
—
The confluence of celebrity influence and cryptocurrency is a volatile cocktail, as recent events surrounding Grammy-winning rapper Cardi B’s promotion of the WAP memecoin underscore. This crypto saga, marked by rapid market swings, fraud allegations, insider profiteering, and regulatory scrutiny, encapsulates both the allure and the pitfalls of celebrity-endorsed digital assets. Here, we unpack this complex episode, its market reactions, underlying risks, and wider implications for the crypto ecosystem.
The Rise and Fall of WAP: From Promotion to Price Collapse
On October 8, 2024, Cardi B’s official X (formerly Twitter) account promoted a new memecoin named WAP, inspired by her controversial 2020 hit song “Wet Ass Pussy.” The token, themed around a cat mascot and operating on the Solana blockchain, immediately attracted attention due to Cardi B’s massive fanbase and the token’s provocative branding.
However, the response was swift and stunning. Within minutes of the promotional post and video—including a wallet address linked to suspicious activity—the WAP token’s market capitalization plummeted from $2.5 million to approximately $139,000, reflecting a staggering 80% price plunge in a single day. This dramatic crash reveals the fragility and volatility typical of algorithmically-driven meme tokens reacting to hype cycles and market sentiment.
Market observers noted that WAP’s price was artificially buoyed by orchestrated transactions between clusters of wallet addresses, simulating demand that wasn’t organic. These “wash trades” created misleading signals about market interest, a red flag in blockchain trading patterns. Such simulated liquidity is often a tactic used in “pump and dump” schemes, where insiders inflate asset prices before selling into retail demand.
Allegations of Fraud and Regulatory Scrutiny
Adding gravity to the turmoil, investigations revealed links between the wallet address Cardi B shared and cryptocurrency scams originating in prior projects. Blockchain security firm PeckShield and other analysts flagged irregularities in tokenomics and distribution strategies, suggesting that portions of the WAP supply were distributed secretively or free of charge to a network of paid promoters. These actions raise questions about transparency and fairness in token allocation, core tenants for community trust in decentralized projects.
The UAE’s Securities and Commodities Authority (SCA) has also launched an investigation into WAP’s promoters, including Cardi B, spotlighting the increasing involvement of regulators keen to root out fraudulent activity as celebrity crypto endorsements multiply. This probe underscores how emerging markets like the UAE are moving to safeguard investors from deceptive practices in the nascent crypto landscape.
Insider Profits and the Human Side of Hype
Reports surfaced that insiders made approximately $250,000 within 12 hours of WAP’s launch, intensifying speculation about the token’s true intent. This insider windfall amid a collapsing token price portrays a classic scenario: celebrities and connected parties capitalizing on hype before the average investor suffers losses.
For Cardi B’s fanbase, the episode jolts the perception of trust and authenticity. Fans who believed they were backing a genuine project aligned with Cardi B’s brand may feel misled, especially given the memecoin’s provocative allure. This raises broader questions about the responsibilities that public figures hold when venturing into crypto promotions, voluntarily or otherwise.
Celebrity Crypto Endorsements: Broader Context and Comparisons
Celebrity memecoin launches have become a recurring spectacle, with outcomes varying widely. While Cardi B’s WAP and earlier hits like “LohanCoin” have been mired in controversy, others, like Australian rapper Iggy Azalea’s MOTHER token, buck trends by maintaining stronger market performance and community support.
Nonetheless, the surge and bust of celebrity-driven coins fuel skepticism amongst regulators, investors, and crypto veterans. Many in the crypto community caution against blindly trusting celebrity endorsements, emphasizing the need to conduct independent due diligence. The WAP saga exemplifies how easily hype can mask underlying weaknesses or hidden agendas.
The Impact on Mainstream and Crypto Culture
Supporters argue that coins like WAP have the potential to bridge mainstream pop culture and blockchain innovation, opening new avenues for fans to engage with artists and decentralized communities. Cardi B’s venture into crypto could have been a unique cultural moment where music, memes, and money merged.
Instead, the controversy highlights ongoing challenges around trust, security, and the immature infrastructure of the meme coin market. It also spotlights how provocative branding—while effective for marketing—might backfire if associated with instability or fraud, potentially tarnishing both the celebrity’s reputation and the broader crypto brand.
—
Conclusion: Lessons from the WAP Token Episode
The WAP memecoin episode surrounding Cardi B reveals the precarious balance between celebrity influence and crypto market mechanics. It illustrates how rapid hype can quickly reverse into dramatic losses fueled by questionable practices and market manipulation. The swift regulatory response and investor backlash serve as reminders that the crypto space requires vigilance, transparency, and integrity, especially when popular figures lend their names.
For artists and promoters considering crypto engagement, the WAP story underscores the importance of thorough vetting and ethical responsibility in blockchain projects. For investors, it reinforces the imperative of skepticism and research beyond flashy endorsements. Ultimately, the WAP controversy is a vivid chapter in the evolving narrative of crypto’s intersection with celebrity, culture, and commerce—an arena that promises innovation but demands cautions grounded in experience.
