The USC-Notre Dame Football Rivalry: A Historic Tradition Facing an Uncertain Future
The annual football matchup between the University of Southern California (USC) Trojans and the University of Notre Dame Fighting Irish is one of college football’s most enduring and celebrated rivalries. Dating back to 1926, this series has woven itself into the very fabric of both institutions’ athletic identities and has been a hallmark of intersectional college football. However, recent developments in conference realignment, scheduling strategies, and playoff considerations have cast doubt on the rivalry’s continuity beyond the mid-2020s. This report delves into the deep history of the USC-Notre Dame rivalry, the factors currently influencing its uncertain future, the positions of both schools’ athletic departments, and the broader implications for college football traditions.
—
Historical Significance and Rivalry Legacy
Since the initial meeting in 1926, USC and Notre Dame have clashed on the gridiron nearly every year, with few interruptions: World War II (1943-45) and the unique challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. This consistency has cultivated a rich tradition spanning nearly a century, with the two programs combining for numerous national championships and Heisman Trophy winners. Notre Dame leads the all-time series, holding a record of approximately 51-38-5 in their favor, marking it as one of the most balanced and fiercely contested rivalries in college football.
The game extends beyond pure competition; it carries symbolic weight as the nation’s premier intersectional rivalry, pitting a storied independent program from the Midwest against the West Coast powerhouse. The annual stakes often include a shiny trophy—the Jeweled Shillelagh—and bragging rights that last all year. This tradition has not only defined each season for fans and players but has also been a significant cultural event within both communities.
—
Recent Challenges: Conference Realignment and Scheduling Dynamics
The landscape of college football has shifted dramatically in recent years, and these changes directly impact the USC-Notre Dame rivalry. USC’s move from the Pac-12 to the Big Ten Conference is particularly significant. This transition means the Trojans face a more rigorous and geographically expansive conference schedule against heavyweights like Ohio State, Michigan, and Penn State. With more demanding conference obligations, USC has begun reevaluating the feasibility and strategic value of maintaining its annual non-conference games, including the longstanding fixture against Notre Dame.
Additionally, Notre Dame’s recent scheduling commitment to Clemson—a 12-game annual series beginning in 2027 and running through 2038—raises questions about Notre Dame’s availability for other high-profile rivalries like USC. The Clemson series aligns Notre Dame with a dominant Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC) powerhouse, likely enhancing their College Football Playoff (CFP) resume. Consequently, this new commitment has precipitated speculation and concern among college football observers, fans, and even within both schools about whether Notre Dame will continue prioritizing the USC matchup.
These developments come at a time when the structure of college football itself is in flux, grappling with CFP expansion, increased emphasis on strength of schedule, and television rights considerations. In this environment, programs are meticulously crafting schedules to maximize playoff probability, exposure, and revenue, sometimes at the expense of historic rivalries.
—
Perspectives from USC and Notre Dame Athletic Departments
The outlook from each institution’s athletic leadership has been mixed but generally shows Notre Dame as firmly committed to sustaining the rivalry, while USC’s stance appears more guarded and pragmatic.
Notre Dame Athletic Director Pete Bevacqua has expressed clear support for continuing the series, stating he believes the rivalry “should be played every year for as long as college football exists.” Bevacqua’s remarks underscore the cultural and traditional importance of the matchup for Notre Dame’s community and its athletic philosophy. Bevacqua’s public commitment signals that Notre Dame views the USC rivalry as more than just a game—it is a crucial link to their heritage and identity.
In contrast, USC Athletic Director Jennifer Cohen has acknowledged the significance of the series but has also hinted at potential challenges. When discussing the future, Cohen indicated that an ideal world would see USC play Notre Dame annually but stopped short of confirming a guaranteed continuation. USC head coach Lincoln Riley has voiced a practical perspective, emphasizing that while preserving the rivalry is desirable, the pursuit of national championships and the complexities of scheduling stronger opponents may limit the feasibility of the game every season.
These differences illustrate the tension between preserving tradition and adapting to evolving competitive realities. USC’s move to the Big Ten and the associated increase in high-stakes conference games forces a reevaluation of long-term scheduling priorities.
—
Broader Implications for College Football Traditions
The potential decline or cessation of the USC-Notre Dame rivalry represents a broader trend in college football where historic series face jeopardy amid shifting priorities. As programs align themselves with power conferences or seek advantageous playoff positioning, long-standing rivalries that do not directly contribute to those goals may be sacrificed.
More specifically, Notre Dame’s independent status has always afforded it scheduling flexibility, allowing iconic matchups nationwide. However, with the new exclusive commitment to Clemson and sustained ACC affiliations, Notre Dame’s schedule is becoming more conference-centric. Meanwhile, USC’s Big Ten membership blends a rigorous conference slate with the need to balance non-conference games strategically.
This evolving environment forces a balancing act between honoring historical rivalries and meeting the practical demands of modern collegiate athletics. Fans may lament the potential loss of storied games that generate widespread excitement and media attention, but universities must navigate these changes with a focus on competitiveness, financial viability, and institutional goals.
—
Conclusion: The Crossroads of Heritage and Modernity
The USC-Notre Dame football rivalry stands at a critical juncture, emblematic of the challenges facing college football’s historic traditions in an era of conference realignment and playoff expansion. With nearly a century of memorable games, both schools carry deep emotional and institutional investment in the series. Notre Dame’s leadership expresses unwavering commitment to its continuation, while USC grapples with the realities imposed by its Big Ten schedule and national aspirations.
The rivalry’s future likely hinges on mutual flexibility, creative scheduling solutions, and the evolving landscape of college football. Whether this iconic matchup endures as an annual tradition or shifts to a less frequent contest, its legacy remains indelible. For fans and institutions alike, the stakes transcend a single game—they encapsulate the tension between honoring timeless rivalries and navigating the new frontier of collegiate sports. The outcome will shape not only USC and Notre Dame’s futures but also signal how college football balances heritage with progress in the years ahead.
