College Football Realignment: Texas State’s Role in Rebuilding the Pac-12
The evolving landscape of college football conference realignment has firmly placed Texas State University at the center of discussions regarding the Pac-12’s efforts to rebuild and regain competitive prominence. With shifting memberships, media rights negotiations, and strategic positioning for the coming decade, Texas State emerges as a pivotal piece in the Pac-12’s puzzle. This report explores the factors driving this realignment, elaborates on why Texas State is considered a sensible target, and analyzes the broader implications for the Pac-12 and college football as a whole.
—
Context: The Pac-12’s Urgent Need for Stability and Membership
The Pac-12 Conference has faced significant turbulence amid recent departures of key schools such as Boise State, Colorado State, San Diego State, Fresno State, and Utah State to other conferences, notably the Mountain West (MWC). After these exits, the Pac-12 was left with only seven football-playing members, falling below the NCAA’s requirement of eight to sustain its status as a recognized FBS conference.
In response, the Pac-12 has aggressively sought to add new members before the 2026 football season and finalize a new media rights deal critical to funding and competitiveness. The addition of schools that bring both football viability and market potential has become a priority as the conference aims to maintain its standing among the power conferences.
—
Why Texas State Makes Strategic Sense for the Pac-12
Geographical and Market Considerations
Texas State University, located in San Marcos, Texas, occupies a valuable geographic niche. Incorporating Texas State extends the Pac-12’s footprint deeper into Texas, a state rich in football culture and talent. This aligns with the conference’s broader strategy of expanding into Southern and Southwestern markets to compete with the Big 12, SEC, and other major conferences.
Meeting the Eight-Team Football Threshold
With Texas State’s addition, the Pac-12 would meet the minimum requirement of eight football-playing members, securing conference status for the 2026 season without relying on football-only affiliates or partial memberships. This reduces management complexities and strengthens the conference’s structure.
Growth Potential and Future-Oriented Membership
Unlike some schools with immediate but limited appeal, Texas State is seen as a developing program with considerable growth prospects. Texas State’s football program is on an upward trajectory, and the university’s broader athletics infrastructure and potential for increased investment could translate into higher competitiveness within the Pac-12 over time.
Its inclusion isn’t merely a stopgap; rather, it represents a future-focused strategy as the Pac-12 looks beyond the present, considering sustainability and continued evolution through 2030 and beyond. As noted by sports analyst Jon Wilner and echoed in multiple media reports, expansion must anticipate long-term viability, not just short-term gains.
Financial and Media Rights Implications
The Pac-12’s media rights deal remains in flux but is undeniably a linchpin in the conference’s survival and growth. Texas State’s current Sun Belt payout is comparatively modest at around $2 million per year, whereas the Pac-12’s upcoming deal might deliver significantly larger revenues per school (estimates range from $5 million to $12 million annually). Joining the Pac-12 offers Texas State a potential financial boost, enabling improvements to athletic facilities, program funding, and broader university visibility.
From the Pac-12’s perspective, adding Texas State prior to the July 1 fee increase deadline (from $5 million to $10 million exit fee for leaving the Sun Belt) is a calculated move to avoid higher costs while securing membership.
—
Alternative Candidates and Conference Dynamics
While Texas State stands out as a leading candidate, other schools such as Memphis, Tulane, and UTSA have also been considered or courted, often with football-only memberships or shifting conference affiliations (e.g., Sun Belt to Conference USA). Some programs like Memphis and Tulane have previously spurned Pac-12 overtures despite fan interest.
The broader realignment ripple effect touches multiple conferences:
– Mountain West (MWC): Has lost teams to the Pac-12 but is actively trying to replenish its ranks. It offered Texas State membership, which Texas State declined, electing to stay in the Sun Belt for the time being.
– Sun Belt Conference: Faces challenges retaining members as the allure of larger media deals and competition beckons.
– American Athletic Conference (AAC): Disrupted by potential defections from schools like Memphis and Tulane, further fueling the reshaping of collegiate athletic alignments.
—
The Pac-12’s Reconstruction Challenges and Outlook
Despite the move to add Texas State and other Mountain West schools, the Pac-12’s path remains complex:
– Media deal uncertainty: The financial viability of the rebuilt Pac-12 hinges on securing an adequate rights contract. Without substantial media revenue, the conference risks continued marginalization.
– Competitive balance: The addition of emerging programs helps, but the conference must uplift its brand, facilities, and level of play to compete with the SEC and Big 12, both currently powerhouses.
– Delay and timing pressures: Decisions must be finalized rapidly to meet NCAA conference membership rules for 2026, and the looming exit fee increases add urgency.
– Long-term strategy: Thoughtful expansion that targets future growth rather than mere patchwork is fundamental to the Pac-12’s survival.
—
Conclusion: Texas State as a Catalyst for Pac-12 Renewal
Texas State University’s anticipated inclusion in the Pac-12 represents a strategic inflection point for the conference’s rebuilding effort. With its geographical advantage, developmental potential, and alignment with the Pac-12’s need for a stable eight-team football membership, Texas State offers a practical and future-oriented solution amid the chaotic conference realignment landscape.
As the Pac-12 negotiates its media rights and navigates the complexities of a competitive collegiate sports ecosystem, this move could symbolize a stepping stone toward recovery. However, the conference’s revival will depend on more than membership numbers — it will require financial fortification, brand revitalization, and a sustained commitment to competing at the highest level.
Texas State’s role is not just as a placeholder but as a partner in redefining what the Pac-12 will stand for in this new era of college football. How well this gamble pays off will shape the narrative of the Pac-12 and influence the broader makeup of college sports for years to come.
