Navigating the Cleveland Browns’ Crowded Quarterback Room: The Case of Shedeur Sanders and Dillon Gabriel
The Cleveland Browns’ quarterback landscape entering the 2025 season presents an intriguing and complex dynamic, centered around promising rookies Shedeur Sanders and Dillon Gabriel, alongside veterans Kenny Pickett and Joe Flacco. The team’s investments in Sanders (fifth-round pick) and Gabriel (third-round pick) have sparked debate and raised questions over roster decisions, developmental priorities, and long-term strategy. This report dissects the Browns’ quarterback situation, evaluating the prospects, their fit within the organization, and the potential outcomes for the franchise as they navigate this crowded room.
—
Setting the Stage: Browns’ Aggressive Quarterback Acquisitions
In the 2025 NFL Draft, Cleveland made a noteworthy move by drafting two quarterbacks — Dillon Gabriel in the third round (top 100 overall) and Shedeur Sanders in the fifth round (144th overall). This dual selection surprised many analysts, especially given Sanders’ slide in the draft despite his pedigree as a high-profile college signal-caller from Colorado. The Browns also boast veteran presence in Kenny Pickett and Joe Flacco, further intensifying competition for playing time and the long-term quarterback role.
The juxtaposition of Gabriel’s earlier selection and Sanders’ later round pick underscores the team’s layered evaluation: Gabriel is seen as a more polished prospect with leadership qualities, decision-making acumen, and mobility, while Sanders offers raw arm talent and a strong storyline, being the son of legendary coach Deion Sanders. The Browns’ bold move to trade up and grab Sanders in the fifth round reflects confident assessment that his potential outweighs his draft position.
—
Pros and Cons: Shedeur Sanders’ Profile in Context
Pros:
– Arm Talent and Accuracy: Sanders impressed scouts with his ability to make all the throws, particularly shining on short-intermediate routes and demonstrating an above-average deep ball. His arm strength and accuracy differentiated him, especially in contested throws beyond 20 yards.
– Developmental Upside: Though some questioned his draft slide, the Browns’ willingness to move up to ensure his selection reveals a belief in Sanders’ untapped potential and belief he can outperform his fifth-round status.
– Character and Adaptability: Reports from rookie minicamps and early team interactions highlight Sanders’ competitive yet collaborative nature. He has adapted well to an unexpected quarterback room scenario, maintaining camaraderie with Gabriel and embracing the competition without friction.
– High Football IQ: Having played under the tutelage of his father, Sanders showcases advanced football knowledge, which could expedite his transition from college to the pro game over time.
Cons:
– Draft Position and Expectations: Being a fifth-round pick naturally limits immediate expectations and reduces margin for error in making the roster. The Browns’ financial and strategic allocation likely gives Gabriel an early edge.
– Inexperience Against NFL Defenses: Sanders is entering an advanced, complex NFL system with limited professional-level adaptation. Questions remain about how quickly he can process NFL defenses and handle game-speed pressure.
– Competition Intensity: With multiple quarterbacks on the roster, including veterans, Sanders faces a challenging path to secure meaningful playing time or even a roster spot beyond training camp.
– Uncertain Team Dynamics: The Browns’ quarterback strategy involves evaluating numerous options, and the potential for roster cuts could see Sanders at risk, should other players outperform him during offseason and preseason.
—
Dillon Gabriel vs. Shedeur Sanders: Differentiating the Prospects
Gabriel’s third-round selection conveys the Browns see him as closer to being pro-ready. Known for his sharp decision-making, pocket mobility, and leadership, Gabriel appears the early favorite to sit behind or contest with Kenny Pickett. His collegiate history includes consistent production and experience in high-pressure situations, traits the front office values for both immediate support and potential growth.
Comparatively, Sanders embodies more of a developmental project with a strong arm and exciting playmaking skills, but who enters with less fanfare and more uncertainty. Analysts have noted Sanders may outperform expectations but require a longer runway to reach NFL starting capabilities.
The Browns’ dual investment signals a strategic hedging — Gabriel as the more proven, Sanders as the developmental gamble — with future roster decisions reflecting their progress and adaptation during practices and games.
—
Team Strategy and Roster Outlook: The Browns’ Dilemma
The Browns’ quarterback room for 2025 is a unique case of abundance and ambiguity. With four quarterbacks, the team faces a tough choice:
– Keeping all four risks dilution of reps, which can stunt important development for rookies.
– Cutting one or more quarterbacks may spark controversy depending on performance and upside.
– Veteran Joe Flacco’s future with the team is uncertain; his presence serves as a mentor but may also block rookie opportunities.
Insiders and former NFL executives speculate the Browns may not retain all quarterbacks beyond camp. There is talk of Sanders being the most vulnerable candidate due to draft slot and current depth chart hierarchy, despite internal confidence in his abilities. Flacco and Pickett’s experience could give them early-season starting or backup roles, while Gabriel and Sanders battle to prove their worth.
Sanders’ own candid remarks reflect realism about the crowded situation but also a readiness to compete and “prove people wrong” after his draft day slide. Both rookies have embraced a “competition with camaraderie” approach, alleviating potential tension and fostering a growth environment.
—
Long-Term Implications and Potential Futures
If Sanders can translate his arm talent and football IQ into NFL success, he might emerge as a dynamic contributor or future starter — a value pick that outplayed his draft capital. Alternatively, if Gabriel solidifies himself as a dependable backup or starter-in-the-making by leveraging his polished college resume and leadership, the Browns will have reinforced their quarterback pipeline effectively.
The Browns face a strategic balance: immediate performance needs with Kenny Pickett and Joe Flacco, while nurturing the long-term evolution of Gabriel and Sanders. How they manage development reps, cut decisions, and game-day roles will reverberate through the franchise’s quarterback future for several seasons.
—
Conclusion: A Quarterback Conundrum Poised for Dramatic Resolution
Cleveland’s decision to draft both Dillon Gabriel and Shedeur Sanders in 2025 has created a vibrant yet precarious quarterback room that underscores the challenges teams face in balancing current needs with developmental prospects. Sanders, in particular, represents a raw talent with significant potential but carries the risks associated with mid-to-late draft selections.
The Browns have shown they value Sanders’ skillset and character by trading up to select him, signaling optimism about his future impact. Nonetheless, the crowded quarterback roster and competitive realities suggest that Sanders must quickly prove his value or risk an uncertain path forward with Cleveland.
Ultimately, the Browns’ quarterback saga will be one of the most compelling storylines in the 2025 NFL season — a blend of talent, rivalry, and high-stakes decision-making that will shape the franchise’s trajectory. Whether Sanders carves out a lasting role or fades amidst the competition remains to be seen, but his journey exemplifies the unpredictable nature of NFL development and the complexities of roster construction.
